JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 5, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Nubia Cecilia Perdomo Rangel·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Reiteración de improcedencia
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
Accion De Tutela En Materia De Exoneracion De Copagos Y Cuotas De Recuperacion En El Regimen Subsidiado De Salud
  • Aclarar parte resolutiva de la sentencia T-762 de 2013 en lo relativo al nombre de la agente oficiosa
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional del artículo 309 del CPC en la actualidad artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se ACLARA el numeral tercero de la parte resolutiva de la sentencia T-762/13, en lo relativo al nombre de la agente oficiosa.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. ACLARAR el numeral
  2. tercero. de la Sentencia T-762 de 2013 en lo relativo al nombre de la agente oficiosa el cual quedara asi:
  3. "
  4. TERCERO. ORDENAR al Hospital Simon Bolivar exonerar del pago del saldo insoluto de la obligacion contenida en el pagare firmado por la Senora NUBIA CECILIA PERDOMO RANGEL como respaldo de los servicios medicos realizados a su hijo en dicho Hospital"
  5. Contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.